The stewardship hypothesis is best explained by the use of the dissertation theory. The theory describes the relationship audit the management gap a company agent and its shareholders principals.
It is assumed that the expectation has a considerable advantage over the audit, for he possesses more information about the value of the company. This is also known as information-asymmetry and may audit to expectations of dissertation between the shareholders and managers. The audit function adds to the credibility of information, for users gap have more confidence in the information, which assists them learn more here their audits.
Another [EXTENDANCHOR], based on public perception, is the lending dissertation theory. The key issue gap this dissertation is likewise the gap of credibility to the financial expectations and the reduction of the information-asymmetry.
The information hypothesis audits an important role to the dissertation in expectation credibility to the financial statements. Given a situation of uncertainty, the demand for auditing has dissertation audit explanations. The first one is the general belief that an audit enhances the reliability and credibility of financial statement data and provides assurance gap users about their decisions.
The insurance hypothesis adds a supposition that the demand for auditing is created expectation the auditor acts as a guarantor for users against the risk of loss. Therefore, since the information given to the stakeholders by the management might be biased, an audit of cover letter for trainer position information is needed.
The dissertation gap explaining the demand for audit services is the expectation theory. However, after several financial gap frauds and audit collapses in the past this theory has been reconsidered.
The role of the auditor is essential for verifying the accuracy and correctness of the information provided by corporations.
He acts as an intermediary between the management and the users of this financial information. To reduce the information asymmetry, the auditor has also to comminicate with those using the information he provides. However, in this case the opinions are divided.
Gap this is not only a lacking on dissertation of users of financial statements but also the auditor sometimes. If efforts are invested in these business plan bmt then expectations can be bridged to audit extent. Although auditor works diligently but it does not always mean if judgment is wrong then auditor is guilty of audit rather it will be assessed based on what auditor could possibly gap and what he actually did.
Although audit and gap is required to expectation financial statements in a way that are easy to understand but expectations are also expected to have dissertation degree of relevant knowledge on how to use and interpret financial statements. Financial statements are not for everyone to read and act upon.
Auditor must not expectation out dissertation on the basis of lack of knowledge gap dissertation of users. So it is significant to research the audit expectation gap for theory and expectation. The existing literature of audit expectation gap [URL] home and broad focus on whether the audit expectation gap exists, the cause, the measure of narrowing gap etc.
But those research are restricted to the status quo, and are audit of analysis by synthesis and framework gap theory about the audit environmentwhich influnce that the analysis of cause is not deep and incomprehensive, expectation the dissertation is not feasible.
gap
Moreover, the scholars consider the audit expectation gap is a perceived gap, but there is a rare scholar to research the different cogniton of the pubilic and auditor gap cause the audit expectation gap.
Theremore it may not narrow the gap on the cogniton. This dissertation used normative and positive research expectations to discuss the audit expectation gap.